Soybean variety 91B42

ABSTRACT

A soybean variety designated 91B42, the plants and seeds of soybean variety 91B42, methods for producing a soybean plant produced by crossing the variety 91B42 with itself or with another soybean plant, and hybrid soybean seeds and plants produced by crossing the variety 91B42 with another soybean variety or plant, and the creation of variants by mutagenesis or transformation of variety 91B42. The invention also relates to methods for producing other soybean varieties or breeding varieties derived from soybean variety 91B42 and to soybean varieties or breeding varieties produced by those methods.

CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application claims benefit of the priority date of U.S. Patent Ser. No. 60/352,800 filed Jan. 29, 2002, which is incorporated herein by reference.

FIELD OF INVENTION

This invention is in the field of soybean breeding, specifically relating to a soybean variety designated 91B42.

BACKGROUND OF INVENTION

The present invention relates to a new and distinctive soybean variety, designated 91B42 which has been the result of years of careful breeding and selection as part of a soybean breeding program. There are numerous steps in the development of any novel, desirable plant germplasm. Plant breeding begins with the analysis and definition of problems and weaknesses of the current germplasm, the establishment of program goals, and the definition of specific breeding objectives. The next step is selection of germplasm that possess the traits to meet the program goals. The goal is to combine in a single variety an improved combination of desirable traits from the parental germplasm. These important traits may include higher seed yield, resistance to diseases and insects, tolerance to drought and heat, and better agronomic qualities.

Field crops are bred through techniques that take advantage of the plant's method of pollination. A plant is self-pollinated if pollen from one flower is transferred to the same or another flower of the same plant. A plant is sib-pollinated when individuals within the same family or variety are used for pollination. A plant is cross-pollinated if the pollen comes from a flower on a different plant from a different family or variety. The terms “cross-pollination” and “out-cross” as used herein do not include self-pollination or sib-pollination. Soybean plants (Glycine max), are recognized to be naturally self-pollinated plants which, while capable of undergoing cross-pollination, rarely do so in nature. Insects are reported by some researchers to carry pollen from one soybean plant to another and it generally is estimated that less than one percent of soybean seed formed in an open planting can be traced to cross-pollination, i.e. less than one percent of soybean seed formed in an open planting is capable of producing F₁ hybrid soybean plants, See Jaycox, “Ecological Relationships between Honey Bees and Soybeans,” appearing in the American Bee Journal Vol. 110(8): 306-307 (August 1970). Thus intervention for control of pollination is critical to establishment of superior varieties.

A cross between two different homozygous varieties produces a uniform population of hybrid plants that may be heterozygous for many gene loci. A cross of two plants that differ at a number of gene loci will produce a population of hybrid plants that differ genetically and will not be uniform. Regardless of parentage, plants that have been self-pollinated and selected for type for many generations become homozygous at almost all gene loci and produce a uniform population of true breeding progeny.

Soybeans, (Glycine max), can be bred by both self-pollination and cross-pollination techniques. Choice of breeding or selection methods depends on the mode of plant reproduction, the heritability of the trait(s) being improved, and the type of variety used commercially (e.g., F₁ hybrid variety, pureline variety, etc.). For highly heritable traits, a choice of superior individual plants evaluated at a single location will be effective, whereas for traits with low heritability, selection should be based on mean values obtained from replicated evaluations of families of related plants. Popular selection methods commonly include pedigree selection, modified pedigree selection, mass selection, and recurrent selection.

Soybean plant breeding programs combine the genetic backgrounds from two or more lines, varieties or various other germplasm sources into breeding populations from which new lines or varieties are developed by selfing and selection of desired phenotypes. Plant breeding and variety, line or hybrid development, as practiced in a soybean plant breeding program developing significant genetic advancement, are expensive and time consuming processes.

Mutation breeding is one of the many methods of introducing new traits into soybean varieties. Mutations that occur spontaneously or are artificially induced can be useful sources of variability for a plant breeder. The goal of artifical mutagenesis is to increase the rate of mutation for a desired characteristic. Mutation rates can be increased by many different means including temperature, long-term seed storage, tissue culture conditions, radiation; such as X-rays, Gamma rays (e.g. cobalt 60 or cesium 137), neutrons, (product of nuclear fission by uranium 235 in an atomic reactor), Beta radiation (emitted from radioisotopes such as phosphorus 32 or carbon 14), or ultraviolet radiation (preferably from 2500 to 2900 nm), or chemical mutagens (such as base analogues (5-bromo-uracil), related compounds (8-ethoxy caffeine), antibiotics (streptonigrin), alkylating agents (sulfur mustards, nitrogen mustards, epoxides, ethylenamines, sulfates, sulfonates, sulfones, lactones), azide, hydroxylamine, nitrous acid, or acridines. Once a desired trait is observed through mutagenesis the trait may then be incorporated into existing germplasm by traditional breeding techniques. Details of mutation breeding can be found in “Principals of Cultivar Development” Fehr, 1993 Macmillan Publishing Company the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference.

Choice of breeding or selection methods depends on the mode of plant reproduction, the heritability of the trait(s) being improved, and the type of variety used commercially (e.g., F₁ hybrid variety, pureline variety, etc.). For highly heritable traits, a choice of superior individual plants evaluated at a single location will be effective, whereas for traits with low heritability, selection should be based on mean values obtained from replicated evaluations of families of related plants. Popular selection methods commonly include pedigree selection, modified pedigree selection, mass selection, and recurrent selection.

The complexity of inheritance influences choice of the breeding method. In general breeding starts with the crossing of two genotypes, each of which may have one or more desirable characteristics that is lacking in the other or which complements the other. If the two original parents do not provide all the desired characteristics, other sources can be included by making more crosses. In each successive filial generation, superior plants are selected and self-pollinated which increases the homozygosity of the varieties. Typically in a breeding program five or more successive filial generations of selection and selfing are practiced: F₁→F₂; F₂→F₃;F₃→F₄; F₄→F₅, etc. After a sufficient amount of inbreeding, successive filial generation will serve to increase seed of the developed variety. Preferably, a developed variety comprises homozygous allele at about 95% or more of its loci.

Pedigree breeding is commonly used for the improvement of self-pollinating crops. Two parents that possess favorable, complementary traits are crossed to produce an F₁. An F₂ population is produced by selfing one or several F₁'s or by intercrossing two F₁'s (sib mating). Selection of the best individuals may begin in the F₂ population; then, beginning in the F₃, the best individuals in the successive filial generations are selected. Replicated testing of families can begin in the F₄ generation to improve the effectiveness of selection for traits with low heritability. At an advanced stage of inbreeding (i.e., F₆ and F₇), the best varieties or mixtures of phenotypically similar varieties are tested for potential release as new varieties.

Backcross breeding has been used to transfer genes for simply inherited, highly heritable traits from a donor parent into a desirable homozygous variety that is utilized as the recurrent parent. The source of the traits to be transferred is called the donor parent. After the initial cross, individuals possessing the desired trait or traits of the donor parent are selected and then repeatedly crossed (backcrossed) with the recurrent parent. The resulting plant is expected to have the attributes of the recurrent parent (e.g., variety) plus the desirable trait or traits transferred from the donor parent. This approach has been used extensively for breeding disease resistant varieties.

Each soybean breeding program should include a periodic, objective evaluation of the efficiency of the breeding procedure. Evaluation criteria vary depending on the goal and objectives, but should include gain from selection per year based on comparisons to an appropriate standard, overall value of the advanced breeding varieties, and number of successful varieties produced per unit of input (e.g., per year, per dollar expended, etc.).

Various recurrent selection techniques are used to, improve quantitatively inherited traits controlled by numerous genes. The use of recurrent selection in self-pollinating crops depends on the ease of pollination and the number of hybrid offspring from each successful cross.

Mass selection and recurrent selection can be used to improve populations of either self- or cross-pollinated crops. A genetically variable population of heterozygous individuals is either identified or created by intercrossing several different parents. The best plants are selected based on individual superiority, outstanding progeny, or excellent combining ability. The selected plants are intercrossed to produce a new population in which further cycles of selection are continued.

The single-seed descent procedure in the strict sense refers to planting a segregating population, harvesting a sample of one seed per plant, and using the one-seed sample to plant the next generation. When the population has been advanced from the F₂ to the desired level of inbreeding, the plants from which varieties are derived will each trace to different F₂ individuals. The number of plants in a population declines each generation due to failure of some seeds to germinate or some plants to produce at least one seed. As a result, not all of the F₂ plants originally sampled in the population will be represented by a progeny when generation advance is completed.

In a multiple-seed procedure, soybean breeders commonly harvest one or more pods from each plant in a population and thresh them together to form a bulk. Part of the bulk is used to plant the next generation and part is put in reserve. The procedure has been referred to as modified single-seed descent or the pod-bulk technique.

The multiple-seed procedure has been used to save labor at harvest. It is considerably faster to thresh pods with a machine than to remove one seed from each by hand for the single-seed procedure. The multiple-seed procedure also makes it possible to plant the same number of seeds of a population each generation of inbreeding. Enough seeds are harvested to make up for those plants that did not germinate or produce seed.

Molecular markers which includes markers identified through the use of techniques such as such Isozyme Electrophoresis, Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphisms (RFLPs), Randomly Amplified Polymorphic DNAs (RAPDs), Arbitrarily Primed Polymerase Chain Reaction (AP-PCR), DNA Amplification Fingerprinting (DAF), Sequence Characterized Amplified Regions (SCARs), Amplified Fragment Length Polymorphisms (AFLPs), Simple Sequence Repeats (SSRs), and Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms (SNPs) may be used in plant breeding methods. One use of molecular markers is Quantitative Trait Loci (QTL) mapping. QTL mapping is the use of markers, which are known to be closely linked to alleles that have measurable effects on a quantitative trait. Selection in the breeding process is based upon the accumulation of markers linked to the positive effecting alleles and/or the elimination of the markers linked to the negative effecting alleles from the plants genome.

Molecular markers can also be used during the breeding process for the selection of qualitative traits. For example, markers closely linked to alleles or markers containing sequences within the actual alleles of interest can be used to select plants that contain the alleles of interest during a backcrossing breeding program. For example, molecular markers are often used in soybean breeding for selection of the trait of resistance to soybean cyst nematode, See, U.S. Pat. No. 6,162,967. The markers can also be used to select for the genome of the recurrent parent and against the markers of the donor parent. Using this procedure can minimize the amount of genome from the donor parent that remains in the selected plants. It can also be used to reduce the number of crosses back to the recurrent parent needed in a backcrossing program. The use of molecular markers in the selection process is often called Genetic Marker Enhanced Selection. Molecular markers may also be used to identify and exclude certain sources of germplasm as parental varieties or ancestors of a plant by providing a means of tracking genetic profiles through crosses as discussed more fully hereinafter.

The production of double haploids can also be used for the development of homozygous varieties in the breeding program. Double haploids are produced by the doubling of a set of chromosomes (1N) from a heterozygous plant to produce a completely homozygous individual. For example. See Wan et al., “Efficient Production of Doubled Haploid Plants Through Colchicine Treatment of Anther-Derived Maize callus'” Theoretical and Applied genetics, 77:889-892, 1989. This can be advantageous because the process omits the generations of selfing needed to obtain a homozygous plant from a heterozygous source.

Descriptions of other breeding methods that are commonly used for different traits and crops can be found in one of several reference books (e.g., Allard, Principles of Plant Breeding, 1960; Simmonds, Principles of Crop Improvement, 1979; Sneep et al., 1979; Fehr, “Breeding Methods for Cultivar Development”, Chapter 7, Soybean Improvement, Production and Uses, 2^(nd) ed., Wilcox editor, 1987).

Promising advanced breeding varieties are thoroughly tested and compared to appropriate standards in environments representative of the commercial target area(s). The best varieties are candidates for new commercial varieties; those still deficient in a few traits may be used as parents to produce new populations for further selection.

A most difficult task is the identification of individuals that are genetically superior, because for most traits the true genotypic value is masked by other confounding plant traits or environmental factors. One method of identifying a superior plant is to observe its performance relative to other experimental plants and to a widely grown standard variety. Generally a single observation is inconclusive, so replicated observations are required to provide a better estimate of its genetic worth.

Thus, even if the entire genotypes of the parents of the breeding cross were characterized and a desired genotype known, only a few if any individuals having the desired genotype may be found in a large segregating F₂ population. It would be very unlikely that a breeder of ordinary skill in the art would be able to recreate the same variety twice from the very same original parents as the breeder is unable to direct how the genomes combine or how they will interact with the environmental conditions. This unpredictability results in the expenditure of large amounts of research resources in the development of a superior new soybean variety. Breeders use various methods to help determine which plants should be selected from the segregating populations and ultimately which varieties will be used for commercialization. In addition to the knowledge of the germplasm and other skills the breeder uses, a part of the selection process is dependent on experimental design coupled with the use of statistical analysis. Experimental design and statistical analysis are used to help determine which plants, which family of plants, and finally which varieties are significantly better or different for one or more traits of interest. Experimental design methods are used to assess error so that differences between two varieties can be more accurately determined. Statistical analysis includes the calculation of mean values, determination of the statistical significance of the sources of variation, and the calculation of the appropriate variance components. Either a five or a one percent significance levels is customarily used to determine whether a difference that occurs for a given trait is real or due to the environment or experimental error.

One of ordinary skill in the art of plant breeding would know how to evaluate the traits of two plant varieties to determine if there is no significant difference between the two traits expressed by those varieties. For example, see Fehr, Walt, Principles of Cultivar Development, p. 261-286 (1987) which is incorporated herein by reference. Mean trait values may be used to determine whether trait differences are significant, and preferably the traits are measured on plants grown under the same environmental conditions. Once such a variety is developed its value is substantial since it is important to advance the germplasm base as a whole in order to maintain or improve traits such as yield, disease resistance, pest resistance, and plant performance in extreme weather conditions.

The goal of soybean breeding is to develop new, unique and superior soybean varieties. In practical application of a chosen soybean breeding program, the breeder initially selects and crosses two or more parental varieties, followed by repeated selfing and selection, producing many new genetic combinations. Two breeders will never develop the same variety, or even very similar varieties, having the same soybean traits.

Each year, the plant breeder selects the germplasm to advance to the next generation. This germplasm is grown under unique and different geographical, climatic and soil conditions, and further selections are then made during and at the end of the growing season.

Proper testing should detect major faults and establish the level of superiority or improvement over current varieties. In addition to showing superior performance, there must be a demand for a new variety. The new variety must be compatible with industry standards, or must create a new market. The introduction of a new variety may incur additional costs to the seed producer, the grower, processor and consumer, for special advertising and marketing, altered seed and commercial production practices, and new product utilization. The testing preceding release of a new variety should take into consideration research and development costs as well as technical superiority of the final variety. For seed-propagated varieties, it must be feasible to produce seed easily and economically. Preferably residual heterozygosity should not exceed 5%.

These processes, which lead to the final step of marketing and distribution, can take from six to twelve years from the time the first cross is made. Therefore, development of new varieties is a time-consuming process that requires precise forward planning, efficient use of resources, and a minimum of changes in direction.

Soybean (Glycine max), is an important and valuable field crop. Thus, a continuing goal of soybean breeders is to develop stable, high yielding soybean varieties that are agronomically sound. The reasons for this goal are obviously to maximize the amount of grain produced on the land used and to supply food for both animals and humans. To accomplish this goal, the soybean breeder must select and develop soybean plants that have the traits that result in superior varieties.

Pioneer soybean research staff creates over 500,000 potential new varieties each year. Of those new varieties, less than 50 and more commonly less than 25 are actually selected for commercial use.

SUMMARY OF INVENTION

According to the invention, there is provided a novel soybean variety, designated 91B42. This invention thus relates to the seeds of soybean variety 91B42, to the plants of soybean 91B42 to plant parts of soybean variety 91B42 and to methods for producing a soybean plant produced by crossing soybean variety 91B42 with another soybean plant, using 91B42 as either the male or the female parent. This invention also relates to methods for producing a soybean plant containing in its genetic material one or more transgenes and to the transgenic soybean plants and plant parts produced by those methods. This invention also relates to soybean varieties or breeding varieties and plant parts derived from soybean variety 91B42, to methods for producing other soybean varieties, lines or plant parts derived from soybean variety 91B42 and to the soybean plants, varieties, and their parts derived from use of those methods. This invention further relates to soybean seeds, plants, and plant parts produced by crossing the soybean variety 91B42 with another soybean variety. Soybean variety 91B42 demonstrates a unique combination of traits, which include high yield potential, excellent resistance to race 3 of Soybean Cyst Nematode, multi-race Phytophthora root rot resistance which includes resistance to race 25 of Phytophthora megasperma, excellent resistance to Brown Stem Rot, very good iron-deficiency tolerance, relative maturity group 1, sub-group 4, and particularly adapted to Canada, Italy, and the North Central and Eastern areas of the United States. The combination of disease resistances offered by soybean variety 91B42 is highly unique and offers a large benefit.

Definitions

Certain definitions used in the specification are provided below. Also in the examples which follow, a number of terms are used. In order to provide a clear and consistent understanding of the specification and claims, including the scope to be given such terms, the following definitions are provided:

ALLELE=any of one or more alternative forms of a genetic sequence. In a diploid cell or organism, the two alleles of a given sequence occupy corresponding loci on a pair of homologous chromosomes.

BACKCROSSING=Process in which a breeder crosses a progeny variety back to one of the parental genotypes one or more times.

BREEDING=The genetic manipulation of living organisms.

BU/A=Bushels per Acre. The seed yield in bushels/acre is the actual yield of the grain at harvest.

BSR=Brown Stem Rot Tolerance. This is a visual disease score from 1 to 9 comparing all genotypes in a given test. The score is based on leaf symptoms of yellowing and necrosis caused by brown stem rot. A score of 9 indicates no symptoms. Visual scores range down to a score of 1 which indicates severe symptoms of leaf yellowing and necrosis.

CNKR=Stem Canker Tolerance. This is a visual disease score from 1 to 9 comparing all genotypes in a given test. The score is based upon premature plant death. A score of 9 indicates no symptoms, whereas a score of 1 indicates the entire experimental unit died very early.

COTYLEDON=A cotyledon is a type of seed leaf. The cotyledon contains the food storage tissues of the seed.

ELITE VARIETY=A variety that is sufficiently homozygous and homogeneous to be used for commercial grain production. An elite variety may also be used in further breeding.

EMBRYO=The embryo is the small plant contained within a mature seed.

EMGSC=Emergence Score. The percentage of emerged plants in a plot respective to the number of seeds planted.

F₃=This symbol denotes a generation resulting from the selfing of the F₂ generation along with selection for type and rogueing of off-types. The “F” number is a term commonly used in genetics, and designates the number of the filial generation. The “F₃” generation denotes the offspring resulting from the selfing or self mating of members of the generation having the next lower “F” number, viz. the F₂ generation.

FEC=Iron-deficiency Chlorosis. Plants are scored 1 to 9 based on visual observations. A score of 1 indicates the plants are dead or dying from iron-deficiency chlorosis, a score of 5 means plants have intermediate health with some leaf yellowing and a score of 9 means no stunting of the plants or yellowing of the leaves. Plots are usually scored in mid July.

FECL=Iron-deficiency Chlorosis. Plants are scored 1 to 9 based on visual observations. A score of 1 indicates the plants are dead or dying from iron-deficiency chlorosis, a score of 5 means plants have intermediate health with some leaf yellowing and a score of 9 means no stunting of the plants or yellowing of the leaves. Plots are scored around mid August.

FEY=Frogeye Tolerance. This is a visual disease score from 1 to 9 comparing all genotypes in a given test. The score is based upon leaf lesions. A score of 9 indicates no lesions, whereas a score of 1 indicates severe leaf necrosis.

GENOTYPE=Refers to the genetic constitution of a cell or organism.

HABIT=This refers to the physical appearance of a plant. It can be determinate, semi-determinate, intermediate, or indeterminate. In soybeans, indeterminate varieties are those in which stem growth is not limited by formation of a reproductive structure (i.e., flowers, pods and seeds) and hence growth continues throughout flowering and during part of pod filling. The main stem will develop and set pods over a prolonged period under favorable conditions. In soybeans, determinate varieties are those in which stem growth ceases at flowering time. Most flowers develop simultaneously, and most pods fill at approximately the same time. The terms semi-determinate and intermediate are also used to describe plant habit and are defined in Bernard, R. L. 1972. “Two genes affecting stem termination in soybeans.” Crop Science 12:235-239; Woodworth, C. M. 1932. “Genetics and breeding in the improvement of the soybean.” Bull. Agric. Exp. Stn. (Illinois) 384:297-404; Woodworth, C. M. 1933. “Genetics of the soybean.” J. Am. Soc. Agron. 25:36-51.

HGT=Plant Height. Plant height is taken from the top of the soil to top pod of the plant and is measured in inches.

HILUM=This refers to the scar left on the seed which marks the place where the seed was attached to the pod prior to it (the seed) being harvested.

HYPL=Hypocotyl Elongation. This score indicates the ability of the seed to emerge when planted 3″ deep in sand pots and with a controlled temperature of 25° C. The number of plants that emerge each day are counted. Based on this data, each genotype is given a 1 to 9 score based on its rate of emergence and percent of emergence. A score of 9 indicates an excellent rate and percent of emergence, an intermediate score of 5 indicates average ratings and a 1 score indicates a very poor rate and percent of emergence.

HYPOCOTYL=A hypocotyl is the portion of an embryo or seedling between the cotyledons and the root. Therefore, it can be considered a transition zone between shoot and root.

LDGSEV=Lodging Resistance. Lodging is rated on a scale of 1 to 9. A score of 9 indicates erect plants. A score of 5 indicates plants are leaning at a 45° angle in relation to the ground and a score of 1 indicates plants are laying on the ground.

LEAFLETS=These are part of the plant shoot, and they manufacture food for the plant by the process of photosynthesis.

LINKAGE=Refers to a phenomenon wherein alleles on the same chromosome tend to segregate together more often than expected by chance if their transmission was independent.

LINKAGE DISEQUILIBRIUM=Refers to a phenomenon wherein alleles tend to remain together in linkage groups when segregating from parents to offspring, with a greater frequency than expected from their individual frequencies.

LLE=Linoleic Acid Percent. Linoleic acid is one of the five most abundant fatty acids in soybean seeds. It is measured by gas chromatography and is reported as a percent of the total oil content.

LLN=Unolenic Acid Percent. Linolenic acid is one of the five most abundant fatty acids in soybean seeds. It is measured by gas chromatography and is reported as a percent of the total oil content.

MAT ABS=Absolute Maturity. This term is defined as the length of time from planting to complete physiological development (maturity). The period from planting until maturity is reached is measured in days, usually in comparison to one or more standard varieties. Plants are considered mature when 95% of the pods have reached their mature color.

MATURITY GROUP=This refers to an agreed-on industry division of groups of varieties, based on the zones in which they are adapted primarily according to day length or latitude. They consist of very long day length varieties (Groups 000, 00, 0), and extend to very short day length varieties (Groups VII, VIII, IX, X).

OIL=Oil Percent. Soybean seeds contain a considerable amount of oil. Oil is measured by NIR spectrophotometry, and is reported on an as is percentage basis.

OLC=Oleic Acid Percent. Oleic acid is one of the five most abundant fatty acids in soybean seeds. It is measured by gas chromatography and is reported as a percent of the total oil content.

PEDIGREE DISTANCE=Relationship among generations based on their ancestral links as evidenced in pedigrees. May be measured by the distance of the pedigree from a given starting point in the ancestry.

PLM=Palmitic Acid Percent. Palmitic acid is one of the five most abundant fatty acids in soybean seeds. It is measured by gas chromatography and is reported as a percent of the total oil content.

POD=This refers to the fruit of a soybean plant. It consists of the hull or shell (pericarp) and the soybean seeds.

PRT=Phytophthora Tolerance. Tolerance to Phytophthora root rot is rated on a scale of 1 to 9, with a score of 9 being the best or highest tolerance ranging down to a score of 1 which indicates the plants have no tolerance to Phytophthora.

PRMMAT=Predicted Relative Maturity. Soybean maturities are divided into relative maturity groups. In the United States the most common maturity groups are 00 through VIII. Within maturity groups 00 through V are sub-groups. A sub-group is a tenth of a relative maturity group. Within narrow comparisons, the difference of a tenth of a relative maturity group equates very roughly to a day difference in maturity at harvest.

PRO=Protein Percent. Soybean seeds contain a considerable amount of protein. Protein is generally measured by NIR spectrophotometry, and is reported on an as is percentage basis.

PUBESCENCE=This refers to a covering of very fine hairs closely arranged on the leaves, stems and pods of the soybean plant.

RKI=Root-knot Nematode, Southern. This is a visual disease score from 1 to 9 comparing all genotypes in a given test. The score is based upon digging plants to visually score the roots for presence or absence of galling. A score of 9 indicates that there is no galling of the roots, a score of 1 indicates large severe galling cover most of the root system which results in pre-mature death from decomposing of the root system.

RKA=Root-knot Nematode, Peanut. This is a visual disease score from 1 to 9 comparing all genotypes in a given test. The score is based upon digging plants to look at the roots for presence or absence of galling. A score of 9 indicates that there is no galling of the roots, a score of 1 indicates large severe galling cover most of the root system which results in premature death from decomposing of the root system.

SD VIG=Seedling Vigor. The score is based on the speed of emergence of the plants within a plot relative to other plots within an experiment. A score of 9 indicates that 90% of plants growing have expanded first leaves. A score of 1 indicates no plants have expanded first leaves.

SDS=Sudden Death Syndrome. Tolerance to Sudden Death Syndrome is rated on a scale of 1 to 9, with a score of 1 being very susceptible ranging up to a score of 9 being tolerant.

S/LB=Seeds per Pound. Soybean seeds vary in seed size, therefore, the number of seeds required to make up one pound also varies. This affects the pounds of seed required to plant a given area, and can also impact end uses.

SHATTR=Shattering. This refers to the amount of pod dehiscence prior to harvest. Pod dehiscence involves seeds falling from the pods to the soil. This is a visual score from 1 to 9 comparing all genotypes within a given test. A score of 9 means pods have not opened and no seeds have fallen out. A score of 5 indicates approximately 50% of the pods have opened, with seeds falling to the ground and a score of 1 indicates 100% of the pods are opened.

SHOOTS=These are a portion of the body of the plant. They consist of stems, petioles and leaves.

STC=Stearic Acid Percent. Stearic acid is one of the five most abundant fatty acids in soybean seeds. It is measured by gas chromatography and is reported as a percent of the total oil content.

WH MD=White Mold Tolerance. This is a visual disease score from 1 to 9 comparing all genotypes in a given test. The score is based upon observations of mycelial growth and death of plants. A score of 9 indicates no symptoms. Visual scores of 1 indicate complete death of the experimental unit.

For traits rated on a scoring system of 1 to 9, a score of 6 or better is considered good, a score of 7 or better is considered very good, and a score of 8 or better is considered excellent.

Definitions for Area of Adaptability

When referring to area of adaptability, such term is used to describe the location with the environmental conditions that would be well suited for this soybean variety. Area of adaptability is based on a number of factors, for example: days to maturity, insect resistance, disease resistance, and drought resistance. Area of adaptability does not indicate that the soybean variety will grow in every location within the area of adaptability or that it will not grow outside the area.

-   Midwest: Iowa and Missouri -   Heartland: Illinois and the western half of Indiana -   Plains: ⅔ of the eastern parts of South Dakota and Nebraska -   North Central: Minnesota, Wisconsin, the Upper Peninsula of     Michigan, and the eastern half of North Dakota -   Mideast: Michigan, Ohio, and the eastern half of Indiana -   Eastern: Pennsylvania, Delaware, Maryland, Rhode Island, New Jersey,     Connecticut, Massachusetts, New York, Vermont, and Maine -   Southern: Virginia, West Virginia, Tennessee, Kentucky, Arkansas,     North Carolina, South Carolina, Georgia, Florida, Alabama,     Mississippi, and Louisiana -   Western: Texas, Kansas, Colorado, Oklahoma, New Mexico, Arizona,     Utah, Nevada, California, Washington, Oregon, Montana, Idaho,     Wyoming, the western half of North Dakota, and the western ⅓ South     Dakota and Nebraska -   PMG infested soils: soils containing Phytophthora megasperma -   Narrow rows: 7″ and 15″ row spacing -   High yield environments: areas which lack normal stress for example     they have sufficient rainfall, water drainage, low disease pressure,     and low weed pressure -   Tough environments: areas which have stress challenges, opposite of     a high yield environment.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF INVENTION

A soybean variety needs to be homogeneous, substantially homozygous and reproducible to be useful as a commercial variety. There are many analytical methods available to determine the homozygotic stability, phenotypic stability, and identity of these varieties.

The oldest and most traditional method of analysis is the observation of phenotypic traits. The data is usually collected in field experiments over the life of the soybean plants to be examined. Phenotypic characteristics most often observed are for traits associated with seed yield, seed protein and oil content, lodging resistance, disease resistance, maturity, plant height, shattering resistance, etc.

In addition to phenotypic observations, the genotype of a plant can also be examined. There are many laboratory-based techniques available for the analysis, comparison and characterization of plant genotype; among these are Isozyme Electrophoresis, Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphisms (RFLPs), Randomly Amplified Polymorphic DNAs (RAPDs), Arbitrarily Primed Polymerase Chain Reaction (AP-PCR), DNA Amplification Fingerprinting (DAF), Sequence Characterized Amplified Regions (SCARs), Amplified Fragment Length Polymorphisms (AFLPs), Simple Sequence Repeats (SSRs) which are also referred to as Microsatellites, and Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms (SNPs).

Isozyme Electrophoresis and RFLPs have been widely used to determine genetic composition. Shoemaker and Olsen, ((1993) Molecular Linkage Map of Soybean (Glycine max L. Merr.). p. 6.131-6.138. In S. J. O'Brien (ed.) Genetic Maps: Locus Maps of Complex Genomes. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press. Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.), developed a molecular genetic linkage map that consisted of 25 linkage groups with about 365 RFLP, 11 RAPD (random amplified polymorphic DNA), three classical markers, and four isozyme loci. See also, Shoemaker R. C. 1994 RFLP Map of Soybean. P. 299-309 In R. L. Phillips and I. K. Vasil (ed.) DNA-based markers in plants. Kluwer Academic Press Dordrecht, the Netherlands.

SSR technology is currently the most efficient and practical marker technology; more marker loci can be routinely used and more alleles per marker locus can be found using SSRs in comparison to RFLPs. For example Diwan and Cregan, described a highly polymorphic microsatellite loci in Soybean with as many as 26 alleles. (Diwan, N., and P. B. Cregan 1997 Automated sizing of fluorescent-labeled simple sequence repeat (SSR) markers to assay genetic variation in Soybean Theor. Appl. Genet. 95:220-225.) Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms may also be used to identify the unique genetic composition of the invention and progeny varieties retaining that unique genetic composition. Various molecular marker techniques may be used in combination to enhance overall resolution.

Soybean DNA molecular marker linkage maps have been rapidly constructed and widely implemented in genetic studies. One such study is described in Cregan et. Al, “An Integrated Genetic Linkage Map of the Soybean Genome” Crop Science 39:1464-1490 (1999). Sequences and PCR conditions of SSR Loci in Soybean as well as the most current genetic map may be located on the internet at soybase.anron.iastate.edu or soybase.ncgr.org or at http://soybase.ncgr.org/ the disclosures of which are incorporated herein by reference.

The variety of the invention has shown uniformity and stability for all traits, as described in the following variety description information. It has been self-pollinated a sufficient number of generations, with careful attention to uniformity of plant type to ensure homozygosity and phenotypic stability. The variety has been increased with continued observation for uniformity. No variant traits have been observed or are expected in 91B42, as described in Table 1 (Variety Description Information).

Soybean variety 91B42 is a purple flowered soybean variety with tawny pubescence and black colored hila. Soybean variety 91B42 is in the relative maturity group 1, sub-group 4, and is particularly adapted to Canada, Italy, and the North Central and Eastern areas of the United States. Variety 91B42 further demonstrates excellent resistance to race 3 of Soybean Cyst Nematode, multi-race Phytophthora root rot resistance which includes resistance to race 25 of Phytophthora megasperma, excellent resistance to Brown Stem Rot, and very good iron-deficiency tolerance. This variety does well in Soybean Cyst Nematode and Phytophthora megasperma infected soils.

91B42 possesses the unique combination of resistance to races 1-26, 28, and 33-44 of Phytophthora megasperma in addition to resistance to race 3 of Soybean Cyst Nematode. Resistance to races 1-11, 13-15, 17, 18, 21-24, 26, 33, 36-38 and 42-44 of Phytophthora megasperma are governed by the RPS 1-K gene, and resistance to races 1-4, 10, 12, 14-16, 18-21, 25, 28, 33-35, and 38-44 of Phytophthora megasperma are governed by the RPS 6 gene. As used herein the term “multi-race Phytophthora resistance” shall mean resistance to races 1-26, 28, and 33-44 as conferred by the RPS 1k and RPS6 genes. Resistance to race 3 of Soybean Cyst Nematode is a quantitative trait.

Soybean variety 91B42, being substantially homozygous, can be reproduced by planting seeds of the variety, growing the resulting soybean plants under self-pollinating or sib-pollinating conditions, and harvesting the resulting seed, using techniques familiar to the agricultural arts.

TABLE 1 Variety Description Information 91B42 A. Mature Seed Characteristics: Seed Coat Color: yellow Seed Size (grams per 100 seeds): 18 Hilum Color: black Seed Shape: elongated Seed Coat Luster: dull B. Leaf: Leaflet Shape: ovate C. Plant Characteristics: Flower Color: purple Pod Color: tan Cotyledon Color: yellow Hypocotyl Color: dark purple Plant Pubescence Color: tawny Plant Habit: indeterminate Maturity Group: 1 Maturity Sub-Group: 4 D. Fungal Diseases (S = susceptible R = resistant) Phytophthora Rot (Phytophthora megasperma var. sojae): Race 5: R Race 7: R Race 25: R E. Nematode Diseases (S = susceptible R = resistant) Soybean Cyst Nematode Race 3: R (score of 8) Race 14: (score of 6) F. Iron Chlorosis: Very Good tolerance to iron deficiency chlorosis G. Seed Peroxidase Activity: high Publications useful as references in interpreting Table 1 include: Caldwell, B. E. ed. 1973. “Soybeans: Improvement, Production. and Uses” Amer. Soc. Agron. Monograph No. 16; Buttery, B. R., and R. I. Buzzell 1968. “Peroxidase Activity in Seed of Soybean Varieties” Crop Sci. 8: 722-725; Hymowitz, T. 1973. “Electrophoretic analysis of SBTI-A2 in the USDA Soybean Germplasm Collection” Crop Sci., 13: 420-421; Payne R. C., and L. F. Morris, 1976. “Differentiation of Soybean Varieties by Seedling #Pigmentation Patterns” J. Seed. Technol. 1:1-19. The disclosures of which are each incorporated by reference in their entirety. Further Embodiments of the Invention This invention also is directed to methods for producing a soybean plant by crossing a first parent soybean plant with a second parent soybean plant wherein the first or second parent soybean plant is a soybean plant of the variety 91B42. Further, both first and second parent soybean plants can come from the soybean variety 91B42. Still further, this invention also is directed to methods for producing 91B42-derived soybean plant by crossing soybean variety 91B42 with a soybean plant and growing the progeny seed, and repeating the crossing and growing steps with the 91B42-derived soybean plant from 1 to 2 times, 1 to 3 times, 1 to 4 times, or 1 to 5 times. Thus, any such methods using soybean variety 91B42 are part of this invention: selfing, backcrosses, hybrid production, crosses to populations, and the like. All plants produced using soybean variety 91B42 as a parent are within the scope of this invention, including plants derived from soybean variety 91B42. This includes varieties essentially derived from variety 91B42 with the term “essentially derived variety” having the meaning ascribed to such term in 7 U.S.C. § 2104(a)(3) of the Plant Variety Protection Act, which definition is hereby incorporated by reference. The invention also includes progeny plants and parts thereof with at least one ancestor that is 91B42, and more specifically, where the pedigree of the progeny includes 1, 2, 3, 4, and/or 5 or less cross-pollinations to a soybean plant other than 91B42 or a plant that has 91B42 as a progenitor. All breeders of ordinary skill in the art maintain pedigree records of their breeding programs. These pedigree records contain a detailed description of the breeding process, including a listing of all parental varieties used in the breeding process and information on how such variety was used. Thus, a breeder would know if 91B42 were used in the development of a progeny variety, and would also know how many crosses to a plant or variety other than 91B42 or a plant or variety with 91B42 as a progenitor were made in the development of any progeny variety. The soybean variety may also be used in crosses with other, different soybean plant to produce first generation (F₁) soybean seeds and plants with superior characteristics.

Specific methods and products produced using soybean variety 91B42 in plant breeding are encompassed within the scope of the invention listed above.

One such embodiment is a method for developing a 91B42 progeny soybean plant in a soybean plant breeding program comprising: obtaining the soybean plant, or its parts, or variety 91B42 utilizing said plant or plant parts as a source of breeding material; and selecting a 91B42 progeny plant with molecular markers in common with 91B42 and/or with morphological and/or physiological characteristics selected from the characteristics listed in Tables 1 or 2. Breeding steps that may be used in the soybean plant breeding program include pedigree breeding, backcrossing, mutation breeding, and recurrent selection. In conjunction with these steps, techniques such as restriction fragment polymorphism enhanced selection, genetic marker enhanced selection (for example SSR markers), and the making of double haploids may be utilized.

Another such embodiment is the method of crossing soybean variety 91B42 with another soybean plant, such as a different soybean variety, to form a first generation population of F1 hybrid plants. The population of first generation F1 hybrid plants produced by this method is also an embodiment of the invention. This first generation population of F1 plants will comprise an essentially complete set of the alleles of soybean variety 91B42. One of ordinary skill in the art can utilize either breeder books or molecular methods to identify a particular F1 hybrid plant produced using soybean variety 91B42, and any such individual plant is also encompassed by this invention. These embodiments also cover use of these methods with transgenic or single gene conversions of soybean variety 91B42.

Another such embodiment of this invention is a method of using soybean variety 91B42 in breeding that involves the repeated backcrossing to soybean variety 91B42 any number of times. Using backcrossing methods, or even the tissue culture and transgenic methods described herein, the single gene conversion methods described herein, or other breeding methods known to one of ordinary skill in the art, one can develop individual plants, plant cells, and populations of plants that retain at least 25%, 30%, 35%, 40%, 45%, 50%, 55%, 60%, 65%, 70%, 75%, 79%, 80%, 81%, 82%, 83%, 84%, 85%, 86%, 87%, 88%, 89%, 90%, 91%, 92%, 93%, 94%, 95%, 96%, 97%, 98%, 99% or 99.5% genetic contribution from soybean variety 91B42. The percentage of the genetics retained in the progeny may be measured by either pedigree analysis or through the use of genetic techniques such as molecular markers or electrophoresis. In pedigree analysis, on average 50% of the starting germplasm would be passed to the progeny variety after one cross to another variety, 25% after another cross to a different variety, and so on. Molecular markers could also be used to confirm and/or determine the pedigree of the progeny variety.

One method for producing a variety derived from soybean variety 91B42 is as follows. One of ordinary skill in the art would obtain a seed from the cross between soybean variety 91B42 and another variety of soybean, such as an elite variety. The F1 seed derived from this cross would be grown to form a homogeneous population. The F1 seed would contain essentially all of the alleles from variety 91B42 and essentially all of the alleles from the other soybean variety. The F1 nuclear genome would be made-up of 50% variety 91B42 and 50% of the other elite variety. The F1 seed would be grown and allowed to self, thereby forming F2 seed. On average the F2 seed would have derived 50% of its alleles from variety 91B42 and 50% from the other soybean variety, but many individual plants from the population would have a greater percentage of their alleles derived from 91B42 (Wang J. and R. Bernardo, 2000, Crop Sci. 40:659-665 and Bernardo, R. and A. L. Kahler, 2001, Theor. Appl. Genet 102:986-992). Molecular markers of 91B42 could be used to select and retain those varieties with high similarity to 91B42. The F2 seed would be grown and selection of plants would be made based on visual observation, markers and/or measurement of traits. The traits used for selection may be any 91B42 trait described in this specification, including the soybean variety 91B42 traits of high yield potential, excellent resistance to race 3 of Soybean Cyst Nematode, multi-race Phytophthora root rot resistance which includes resistance to race 25 of Phytophthora megasperma, excellent resistance to Brown Stem Rot, very good iron-deficiency tolerance, relative maturity group 1, sub-group 4, and particularly adapted to Canada, Italy, and the North Central and Eastern areas of the United States.

Such traits may also be the good general or specific combining ability of 91B42. The 91B42 progeny plants that exhibit one or more of the desired 91B42 traits, such as those listed above, would be selected and each plant would be harvested separately. This F3 seed from each plant would be grown in individual rows and allowed to self. Then selected rows or plants from the rows would be harvested individually. The selections would again be based on visual observation, markers and/or measurements for desirable traits of the plants, such as one or more of the desirable 91B42 traits listed above. The process of growing and selection would be repeated any number of times until a 91B42 progeny plant is obtained. The 91B42 progeny plant would contain desirable traits derived from soybean plant 91B42, some of which may not have been expressed by the other variety to which soybean variety 91B42 was crossed and some of which may have been expressed by both soybean varieties but now would be at a level equal to or greater than the level expressed in soybean variety 91B42. However, in each case the resulting progeny variety would benefit from the efforts of the inventor(s), and would not have existed but for the inventor(s) work in creating 91B42. The 91B42 progeny plants would have, on average, 50% of their genes derived from variety 91B42, but many individual plants from the population would have a greater percentage of their alleles derived from 91B42. This breeding cycle, of crossing and selfing, and optional selection, may be repeated to produce another population of 91B42 progeny plants with, on average, 25% of their genes derived from variety 91B42, but, again, many individual plants from the population would have a greater percentage of their alleles derived from 91B42. Another embodiment of the invention is a 91B42 progeny plant that has received the desirable 91B42 traits listed above through the use of 91B42, which traits were not exhibited by other plants used in the breeding process.

The previous example can be modified in numerous ways, for instance selection may or may not occur at every selfing generation, selection may occur before or after the actual self-pollination process occurs, or individual selections may be made by harvesting individual pods, plants, rows or plots at any point during the breeding process described. In addition, double haploid breeding methods may be used at any step in the process. The population of plants produced at each and any cycle of breeding is also an embodiment of the invention, and on average each such population would predictably consist of plants containing approximately 50% of its genes from variety 91B42 in the first breeding cycle, 25% of its genes from variety 91B42 in the second breeding cycle, 12.5% of its genes from variety 91B42 in the third breeding cycle and so on. However, in each case the use of 91B42 provides a substantial benefit. The linkage groups of 91B42 would be retained in the progeny varieties, thus it provides a significant advantage to use 91B42 as starting material to produce a variety that retains desired genetics or traits of 91B42.

Another embodiment of this invention is the method of obtaining a substantially homozygous 91B42 progeny plant by obtaining a seed from the cross of 91B42 and another soybean plant and applying double haploid methods to the F1 seed or F1 plant or to any successive filial generation. Based on studies in maize and currently being conducted in soybean, such methods would decrease the number of generations required to produce a variety with similar genetics or characteristics to 91B42. See Bernardo, R. and Kahler, A. L., Theor. Appl. Genet, 102:986-992 (2001).

A further embodiment of the invention is a single gene conversion of 91B42. A single gene conversion occurs when DNA sequences are introduced through traditional (non-transformation) breeding techniques, such as backcrossing (Hallauer et al, 1988). DNA sequences, whether naturally occurring or transgenes, may be introduced using these traditional breeding techniques. The term single gene conversion is also referred to in the art as a single locus conversion. Reference is made to US 2002/0062506A1 for a detailed discussion of single locus conversions and traits that may be incorporated into 91B42 through single gene conversion. Desired traits transferred through this process include, but are not limited to, nutritional enhancements, industrial enhancements, disease resistance, insect resistance, herbicide resistance and yield enhancements. The trait of interest is transferred from the donor parent to the recurrent parent, in this case, the soybean plant disclosed herein. Single gene traits may result from either the transfer of a dominant allele or a recessive allele. Selection of progeny containing the trait of interest is accomplished by direct selection for a trait associated with a dominant allele. Selection of progeny for a trait that is transferred via a recessive allele, requires growing and selfing the first backcross generation to determine which plants carry the recessive alleles. Recessive traits may require additional progeny testing in successive backcross generations to determine the presence of the gene of interest. Along with selection for the trait of interest, progeny are selected for the phenotype of the recurrent parent. It should be understood that occasionally additional polynucleotide sequences or genes are transferred along with the single gene conversion trait of interest. A progeny comprising at least 98%, 99%, 99.5% and 99.9% of the genes from the recurrent parent, the soybean variety disclosed herein, plus containing the single gene conversion trait or traits of interest, is considered to be a single gene conversion of soybean variety 91B42.

This invention is also directed to the use of variety 91B42 in tissue culture. Tissue culture of various tissues of soybeans and regeneration of plants therefrom is well known and widely published. For example, reference may be had to Komatsuda, T. et al., “Genotype X Sucrose Interactions for Somatic Embryogenesis in Soybean,” Crop Sci. 31:333-337 (1991); Stephens, P. A. et al., “Agronomic Evaluation of Tissue-Culture-Derived Soybean Plants,” Theor. Appl. Genet. (1991) 82:633-635; Komatsuda, T. et al., “Maturation and Germination of Somatic Embryos as Affected by Sucrose and Plant Growth Regulators in Soybeans Glycine gracilis Skvortz and Glycine max (L.) Merr.,” Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture, 28:103-113 (1992); Dhir, S. et al., “Regeneration of Fertile Plants from Protoplasts of Soybean (Glycine max L. Merr.): Genotypic Differences in Culture Response,” Plant Cell Reports (1992) 11:285-289; Pandey, P. et al., “Plant Regeneration from Leaf and Hypocotyl Explants of Glycine wightii (W. and A.) VERDC. var. longicauda,” Japan J. Breed. 42:1-5 (1992); and Shetty, K., et al., “Stimulation of In Vitro Shoot Organogenesis in Glycine max (Merrill.) by Allantoin and Amides,” Plant Science 81:(1992) 245-251; as well as U.S. Pat. No. 5,024,944, issued Jun. 18, 1991 to Collins et al. and U.S. Pat. No. 5,008,200, issued Apr. 16, 1991 to Ranch et al., the disclosures of which are hereby incorporated herein in their entirety by reference. Thus, another aspect of this invention is to provide cells which upon growth and differentiation produce soybean plants having the physiological and morphological characteristics of soybean variety 91B42.

As used herein, the term plant includes plant protoplasts, plant cell tissue cultures from which soybean plants can be regenerated, plant calli, plant clumps, and plant cells that are intact in plants or parts of plants, such as embryos, pollen, ovules, seed, flowers, pods, leaves, roots, root tips, anthers, and the like.

All plants produced using soybean variety 91B42 as a parent are within the scope of this invention, including those developed from varieties derived from soybean variety 91B42. Advantageously, the soybean variety could be used in crosses with other, different, soybean plants to produce first generation (F₁) soybean hybrid seeds and plants with superior characteristics. The variety of the invention can also be used for transformation where exogenous genes are introduced and expressed by the variety of the invention. Genetic variants created either through traditional breeding methods using variety 91B42 or through transformation of 91B42 by any of a number of protocols known to those of skill in the art are intended to be within the scope of this invention.

Transformation of Soybean

The advent of new molecular biological techniques have allowed the isolation and characterization of genetic elements with specific functions, such as encoding specific protein products. Scientists in the field of plant biology developed a strong interest in engineering the genome of plants to contain and express foreign genetic elements, or additional, or modified versions of native or endogenous genetic elements in order to alter the traits of a plant in a specific manner. Any DNA sequences, whether from a different species or from the same species, that are inserted into the genome using transformation are referred to herein collectively as “transgenes”. Over the last fifteen to twenty years several methods for producing transgenic plants have been developed, and the present invention, in particular embodiments, also relates to transformed versions of the soybean variety 91B42.

Numerous methods for plant transformation have been developed, including biological and physical, plant transformation protocols. See, for example, Miki et al., “Procedures for Introducing Foreign DNA into Plants” in Methods in Plant Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, Glick, B. R. and Thompson, J. E. Eds. (CRC Press, Inc., Boca Raton, 1993) pages 67-88. In addition, expression vectors and in vitro culture methods for plant cell or tissue transformation and regeneration of plants are available. See, for example, Gruber et al., “Vectors for Plant Transformation” in Methods in Plant Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, Glick, B. R. and Thompson, J. E. Eds. (CRC Press, Inc., Boca Raton, 1993) pages 89-119.

The most prevalent types of plant transformation involve the construction of an expression vector. Such a vector comprises a DNA sequence that contains a gene under the control of or operatively linked to a regulatory element, for example a promoter. The vector may contain one or more genes and one or more regulatory elements.

Various genetic elements can be introduced into the plant genome using transformation. These elements include but are not limited to genes; coding sequences; inducible, constitutive, and tissue specific promoters; enhancing sequences; and signal and targeting sequences. See U.S. Pat. No. 6,162,968, which is herein incorporated by reference.

A genetic trait which has been engineered into a particular soybean plant using transformation techniques, could be moved into another variety using traditional breeding techniques that are well known in the plant breeding arts. For example, a backcrossing approach could be used to move a transgene from a transformed soybean plant to an elite soybean variety and the resulting progeny would comprise a transgene. As used herein, “crossing” can refer to a simple X by Y cross, or the process of backcrossing, depending on the context. The term “cross” excludes the processes of selfing or sibbing.

With transgenic plants according to the present invention, a foreign protein can be produced in commercial quantities. Thus, techniques for the selection and propagation of transformed plants, which are well understood in the art, yield a plurality of transgenic plants which are harvested in a conventional manner, and a foreign protein then can be extracted from a tissue of interest or from total biomass. Protein extraction from plant biomass can be accomplished by known methods which are discussed, for example, by Heney and Orr, Anal. Biochem. 114: 92-6 (1981).

According to a preferred embodiment, the transgenic plant provided for commercial production of foreign protein is a soybean plant. In another preferred embodiment, the biomass of interest is seed. A genetic map can be generated, primarily via conventional RFLP, PCR, and SSR analysis, which identifies the approximate chromosomal location of the integrated DNA molecule. For exemplary methodologies in this regard, see Glick and Thompson, METHODS IN PLANT MOLECULAR BIOLOGY AND BIOTECHNOLOGY 269-284 (CRC Press, Boca Raton, 1993). Map information concerning chromosomal location is useful for proprietary protection of a subject transgenic plant. If unauthorized propagation is undertaken and crosses made with other germplasm, the map of the integration region can be compared to similar maps for suspect plants, to determine if the latter have a common parentage with the subject plant. Map comparisons would involve hybridizations, RFLP, PCR, SSR and sequencing, all of which are conventional techniques.

Likewise, by means of the present invention, agronomic genes can be expressed in transformed plants. More particularly, plants can be genetically engineered to express various phenotypes of agronomic interest. Through the transformation of soybean the expression of genes can be modulated to enhance disease resistance, insect resistance, herbicide resistance, agronomic traits as well as grain quality traits. Transformation can also be used to insert DNA sequences which control or help control male-sterility. DNA sequences native to soybean as well as non-native DNA sequences can be transformed into soybean and used to modulate levels of native or non-native proteins. Anti-sense technology, various promoters, targeting sequences, enhancing sequences, and other DNA sequences can be inserted into the soybean genome for the purpose of modulating the expression of proteins. Exemplary genes implicated in this regard include, but are not limited to, those categorized below.

1. Genes that Confer Resistance to Pests or Disease and that Encode:

(A) Plant disease resistance genes. Plant defenses are often activated by specific interaction between the product of a disease resistance gene (R) in the plant and the product of a corresponding avirulence (Avr) gene in the pathogen. A plant variety can be transformed with a cloned resistance gene to engineer plants that are resistant to specific pathogen strains. See, for example Jones et al., Science 266: 789 (1994) (cloning of the tomato Cf-9 gene for resistance to Cladosporium fulvum); Martin et al., Science 262: 1432 (1993) (tomato Pto gene for resistance to Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato encodes a protein kinase); Mindrinos et al., Cell 78: 1089 (1994) (Arabidopsis RSP2 gene for resistance to Pseudomonas syringae).

(B) A gene conferring resistance to a pest, such as soybean cyst nematode. See e.g. PCT Application WO96/30517; PCT Application WO93/19181.

(C) A Bacillus thuringiensis protein, a derivative thereof or a synthetic polypeptide modeled thereon. See, for example, Geiser et al., Gene 48: 109 (1986), who disclose the cloning and nucleotide sequence of a Bt δ-endotoxin gene. Moreover, DNA molecules encoding δ-endotoxin genes can be purchased from American Type Culture Collection (Manassas, Va.), for example, under ATCC Accession Nos. 40098, 67136, 31995 and 31998. Other examples of Bacillus thuringiensis transgenes being genetically engineered are given in the following patents and hereby are incorporated by reference: U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,188,960; 5,689,052; 5,880,275; and WO 97/40162.

(D) A lectin. See, for example, the disclosure by Van Damme et al., Plant Molec. Biol. 24: 25 (1994), who disclose the nucleotide sequences of several Clivia miniata mannose-binding lectin genes.

(E) A vitamin-binding protein such as avidin. See PCT application US93/06487, the contents of which are hereby incorporated by reference. The application teaches the use of avidin and avidin homologues as larvicides against insect pests.

(F) An enzyme inhibitor, for example, a protease or proteinase inhibitor or an amylase inhibitor. See, for example, Abe et al., J. Biol. Chem. 262: 16793 (1987) (nucleotide sequence of rice cysteine proteinase inhibitor), Huub et al., Plant Molec. Biol. 21: 985 (1993) (nucleotide sequence of cDNA encoding tobacco proteinase inhibitor 1), Sumitani et al., Biosci. Biotech. Biochem. 57: 1243 (1993) (nucleotide sequence of Streptomyces nitrosporeus α-amylase inhibitor) and U.S. Pat. No. 5,494,813 (Hepher and Atkinson, issued Feb. 27, 1996).

(G) An insect-specific hormone or pheromone such as an ecdysteroid and juvenile hormone, a variant thereof, a mimetic based thereon, or an antagonist or agonist thereof. See, for example, the disclosure by Hammock et al., Nature 344: 458 (1990), of baculovirus expression of cloned juvenile hormone esterase, an inactivator of juvenile hormone.

(H) An insect-specific peptide or neuropeptide which, upon expression, disrupts the physiology of the affected pest. For example, see the disclosures of Regan, J. Biol. Chem. 269: 9 (1994) (expression cloning yields DNA coding for insect diuretic hormone receptor), and Pratt et al., Biochem. Biophys. Res. Comm.163: 1243 (1989) (an allostatin is identified in Diploptera puntata). See also U.S. Pat. No. 5,266,317 to Tomalski et al., who disclose genes encoding insect-specific, paralytic neurotoxins.

(I) An insect-specific venom produced in nature by a snake, a wasp, etc. For example, see Pang et al., Gene 116: 165 (1992), for disclosure of heterologous expression in plants of a gene coding for a scorpion insectotoxic peptide.

(J) An enzyme responsible for an hyperaccumulation of a monoterpene, a sesquiterpene, a steroid, hydroxamic acid, a phenylpropanoid derivative or another non-protein molecule with insecticidal activity.

(K) An enzyme involved in the modification, including the post-translational modification, of a biologically active molecule; for example, a glycolytic enzyme, a proteolytic enzyme, a lipolytic enzyme, a nuclease, a cyclase, a transaminase, an esterase, a hydrolase, a phosphatase, a kinase, a phosphorylase, a polymerase, an elastase, a chitinase and a glucanase, whether natural or synthetic. See PCT application WO 93/02197 in the name of Scott et al., which discloses the nucleotide sequence of a callase gene. DNA molecules which contain chitinase-encoding sequences can be obtained, for example, from the ATCC under Accession Nos. 39637 and 67152. See also Kramer et al., Insect Biochem. Molec. Biol.23: 691 (1993), who teach the nucleotide sequence of a cDNA encoding tobacco hookworm chitinase, and Kawalleck et al., Plant Molec. Biol. 21: 673 (1993), who provide the nucleotide sequence of the parsley ubi4-2 polyubiquitin gene.

(L) A molecule that stimulates signal transduction. For example, see the disclosure by Botella et al., Plant Molec. Biol. 24: 757 (1994), of nucleotide sequences for mung bean calmodulin cDNA clones, and Griess et al., Plant Physiol.104: 1467 (1994), who provide the nucleotide sequence of a maize calmodulin cDNA clone.

(M) A hydrophobic moment peptide. See PCT application WO95/16776 (disclosure of peptide derivatives of Tachyplesin which inhibit fungal plant pathogens) and PCT application WO95/18855 (teaches synthetic antimicrobial peptides that confer disease resistance), the respective contents of which are hereby incorporated by reference.

(N) A membrane permease, a channel former or a channel blocker. For example, see the disclosure by Jaynes et al., Plant Sci. 89: 43 (1993), of heterologous expression of a cecropin-β lytic peptide analog to render transgenic tobacco plants resistant to Pseudomonas solanacearum.

(O) A viral-invasive protein or a complex toxin derived therefrom. For example, the accumulation of viral coat proteins in transformed plant cells imparts resistance to viral infection and/or disease development effected by the virus from which the coat protein gene is derived, as well as by related viruses. See Beachy et al., Ann. Rev. Phytopathol.28: 451 (1990). Coat protein-mediated resistance has been conferred upon transformed plants against alfalfa mosaic virus, cucumber mosaic virus, tobacco streak virus, potato virus X, potato virus Y, tobacco etch virus, tobacco rattle virus and tobacco mosaic virus. Id.

(P) An insect-specific antibody or an immunotoxin derived therefrom. Thus, an antibody targeted to a critical metabolic function in the insect gut would inactivate an affected enzyme, killing the insect. Cf. Taylor et al., Abstract #497, SEVENTH INT'L SYMPOSIUM ON MOLECULAR PLANT-MICROBE INTERACTIONS (Edinburgh, Scotland, 1994) (enzymatic inactivation in transgenic tobacco via production of single-chain antibody fragments).

(Q) A virus-specific antibody. See, for example, Tavladoraki et al., Nature 366: 469 (1993), who show that transgenic plants expressing recombinant antibody genes are protected from virus attack.

(R) A developmental-arrestive protein produced in nature by a pathogen or a parasite. Thus, fungal endo α-1,4-D-polygalacturonases facilitate fungal colonization and plant nutrient release by solubilizing plant cell wall homo-α-1,4-D-galacturonase. See Lamb et al., Bio/Technology 10: 1436 (1992). The cloning and characterization of a gene which encodes a bean endopolygalacturonase-inhibiting protein is described by Toubart et al., Plant J. 2: 367 (1992).

(S) A developmental-arrestive protein produced in nature by a plant. For example, Logemann et al., Bio/Technology 10: 305 (1992), have shown that transgenic plants expressing the barley ribosome-inactivating gene have an increased resistance to fungal disease.

(T) Genes involved in the Systemic Acquired Resistance (SAR) Response and/or the pathogenesis related genes. Briggs, S., Current Biology, 5(2) (1995).

(U) Antifungal genes (Cornelissen and Melchers, Pl. Physiol. 101:709-712, (1993) and Parijs et al., Planta 183:258-264, (1991) and Bushnell et al., Can. J. of Plant Path. 20(2):137-149 (1998).

2. Genes that Confer Resistance to a Herbicide, for Example:

(A) A herbicide that inhibits the growing point or meristem, such as an imidazolinone or a sulfonylurea. Exemplary genes in this category code for mutant ALS and AHAS enzyme as described, for example, by Lee et al., EMBO J. 7: 1241 (1988), and Miki et al., Theor. Appl.Genet. 80: 449 (1990), respectively. See also, U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,605,011; 5,013,659; 5,141,870; 5,767,361; 5,731,180; 5,304,732; 4,761,373; 5,331,107; 5,928,937; and 5,378,824; and international publication WO 96/33270, which are incorporated herein by reference in their entireties for all purposes.

(B) Glyphosate (resistance imparted by mutant 5-enolpyruvl-3-phosphikimate synthase (EPSP) and aroA genes, respectively) and other phosphono compounds such as glufosinate (phosphinothricin acetyl transferase, PAT) and Streptomyces hygroscopicus phosphinothricin-acetyl transferase, bar, genes), and pyridinoxy or phenoxy propionic acids and cycloshexones (ACCase inhibitor-encoding genes). See, for example, U.S. Pat. No. 4,940,835 to Shah et al., which discloses the nucleotide sequence of a form of EPSPS which can confer glyphosate resistance. U.S. Pat. No. 5,627,061 to Barry et al. describes genes encoding EPSPS enzymes. See also U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,248,876 B1;6,040,497; 5,804,425; 5,633,435; 5,145,783; 4,971,908; 5,312,910; 5,188,642; 4,940,835; 5,866,775; 6,225,114 B1; 6,130,366; 5,310,667; 4,535,060; 4,769,061; 5,633,448; 5,510,471; Re. 36,449; RE 37,287 E; and 5,491,288; and international publications WO 97/04103;WO97/04114; WO 00/66746; WO 01/66704; WO 00/66748 and WO 00/66747, which are incorporated herein by reference in their entireties for all purposes. Glyphosate resistance is also imparted to plants that express a gene that encodes a glyphosate oxido-reductase enzyme as described more fully in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,776,760 and 5,463,175, which are incorporated herein by reference in their entireties for all purposes. In addition glyphosate resistance can be imparted to plants by the over expression of genes encoding glyphosate N-acetyltransferase. See, for example, U.S. Application Ser. Nos. 60/244,385; 60/377,175 and 60/377,719.

A DNA molecule encoding a mutant aroA gene can be obtained under ATCC Accession No. 39256, and the nucleotide sequence of the mutant gene is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 4,769,061 to Comai. European patent application No. 0 333 033 to Kumada et al. and U.S. Pat. No. 4,975,374 to Goodman et al. disclose nucleotide sequences of glutamine synthetase genes which confer resistance to herbicides such as L-phosphinothricin. The nucleotide sequence of a phosphinothricin-acetyl-transferase gene is provided in European application No. 0 242 246 to Leemans et al. De Greef et al., Bio/Technology 7: 61 (1989), describe the production of transgenic plants that express chimeric bar genes coding for phosphinothricin acetyl transferase activity. See also, U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,969,213; 5,489,520; 5,550,318; 5,874,265; 5,919,675; 5,561,236; 5,648,477; 5,646,024; 6,177,616 B1; and 5,879,903, which are incorporated herein by reference in their entireties for all purposes. Exemplary of genes conferring resistance to phenoxy propionic acids and cycloshexones, such as sethoxydim and haloxyfop, are the Acc1-S1, Acc1-S2 and Acc1-S3 genes described by Marshall et al., Theor. Appl. Genet. 83: 435 (1992).

(C) A herbicide that inhibits photosynthesis, such as a triazine (psbA and gs+ genes) and a benzonitrile (nitrilase gene). Przibilla et al., Plant Cell 3: 169 (1991), describe the transformation of Chlamydomonas with plasmids encoding mutant psbA genes. Nucleotide sequences for nitrilase genes are disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 4,810,648 to Stalker, and DNA molecules containing these genes are available under ATCC Accession Nos. 53435, 67441 and 67442. Cloning and expression of DNA coding for a glutathione S-transferase is described by Hayes et al., Biochem. J. 285: 173 (1992).

(D) Acetohydroxy acid synthase, which has been found to make plants that express this enzyme resistant to multiple types of herbicides, has been introduced into a variety of plants (see, e.g., Hattori et al. (1995) Mol Gen Genet 246:419). Other genes that confer tolerance to herbicides include: a gene encoding a chimeric protein of rat cytochrome P4507A1 and yeast NADPH-cytochrome P450 oxidoreductase (Shiota et al. (1994) Plant Physiol Plant Physiol 106:17), genes for glutathione reductase and superoxide dismutase (Aono et al. (1995) Plant Cell Physiol 36:1687, and genes for various phosphotransferases (Datta et al. (1992) Plant Mol Biol 20:619).

(E) Protoporphyrinogen oxidase (protox) is necessary for the production of chlorophyll, which is necessary for all plant survival. The protox enzyme serves as the target for a variety of herbicidal compounds. These herbicides also inhibit growth of all the different species of plants present, causing their total destruction. The development of plants containing altered protox activity which are resistant to these herbicides are described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,288,306 B1; 6,282,837 B1; and 5,767,373; and international publication WO 01/12825, which are incorporated herein by reference in their entireties for all purposes.

3. Genes that Confer or Contribute to a Value-Added Trait, Such as:

(A) Modified fatty acid metabolism, for example, by transforming a plant with an antisense gene of stearoyl-ACP desaturase to increase stearic acid content of the plant. See Knultzon et al., Proc. Nat'l. Acad. Sci. USA 89: 2624 (1992).

(B) Decreased phytate content

-   -   (1) Introduction of a phytase-encoding gene would enhance         breakdown of phytate, adding more free phosphate to the         transformed plant. For example, see Van Hartingsveldt et al.,         Gene 127: 87 (1993), for a disclosure of the nucleotide sequence         of an Aspergillus niger phytase gene.     -   (2) A gene could be introduced that reduces phytate content. In         maize, this, for example, could be accomplished, by cloning and         then reintroducing DNA associated with the single allele which         is responsible for maize mutants characterized by low levels of         phytic acid. See Raboy et al., Maydica 35: 383 (1990).

(C) Modified carbohydrate composition effected, for example, by transforming plants with a gene coding for an enzyme that alters the branching pattern of starch. See Shiroza et al., J. Bacteriol. 170: 810 (1988) (nucleotide sequence of Streptococcus mutans fructosyltransferase gene), Steinmetz et al., Mol. Gen. Genet. 200: 220 (1985) (nucleotide sequence of Bacillus subtilis levansucrase gene), Pen et al., Bio/Technology 10: 292 (1992) (production of transgenic plants that express Bacillus licheniformis α-amylase), Elliot et al., Plant Molec. Biol. 21: 515 (1993) (nucleotide sequences of tomato invertase genes), Søgaard et al., J. Biol. Chem. 268: 22480 (1993) (site-directed mutagenesis of barley α-amylase gene), and Fisher et at., Plant Physiol. 102: 1045 (1993) (maize endosperm starch branching enzyme 11).

(D) Elevated oleic acid via FAD-2 gene modification and/or decreased linolenic acid via FAD-3 gene modification (see U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,063,947; 6,323,392; and WO 93/11245).

4. Genes that Control Male-Sterility

(A) Introduction of a deacetylase gene under the control of a tapetum-specific promoter and with the application of the chemical N-Ac-PPT (WO 01/29237).

(B) Introduction of various stamen-specific promoters (WO 92/13956, WO 92/13957).

(C) Introduction of the barnase and the barstar gene (Paul et al. Plant Mol. Biol. 19:611-622, 1992).

Numerous methods for plant transformation have been developed, including biological and physical, plant transformation protocols. See, for example, Miki et al., “Procedures for Introducing Foreign DNA into Plants” in Methods in Plant Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, Glick, B. R. and Thompson, J. E. Eds. (CRC Press, Inc., Boca Raton, 1993) pages 67-88. In addition, expression vectors and in vitro culture methods for plant cell or tissue transformation and regeneration of plants are available. See, for example, Gruber et al., “Vectors for Plant Transformation” in Methods in Plant Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, Glick, B. R. and Thompson, J. E. Eds. (CRC Press, Inc., Boca Raton, 1993) pages 89-119. See also, U.S. Pat. No. 5,563,055, (Townsend and Thomas), issued Oct. 8, 1996; U.S. Pat. No. 5,015,580 (Christou, et al, issued May 14, 1991; U.S. Pat. No. 5,322,783 (Tomes, et al.), issued Jun. 21, 1994. Two methods that can be utilized are Agromediated transformation and direct gene transfer. See U.S. Pat. No. 6,162,968, which is herein incorporated by reference.

INDUSTRIAL APPLICABILITY

The seed of soybean variety 91B42, the plant produced from the seed, the hybrid soybean plant produced from the crossing of the variety with any other soybean plant, hybrid seed, and various parts of the hybrid soybean plant can be utilized for human food, livestock feed, and as a raw material in industry.

The soybean is the world's leading source of vegetable oil and protein meal. The oil extracted from soybeans is used for cooking oil, margarine, and salad dressings. Soybean oil is composed of saturated, monounsaturated and polyunsaturated fatty acids. It has a typical composition of 11% palmitic, 4% stearic, 25% oleic, 50% linoleic and 9% linolenic fatty acid content (“Economic Implications of Modified Soybean Traits Summary Report”, Iowa Soybean Promotion Board & American Soybean Association Special Report 92S, May 1990). Changes in fatty acid composition for improved oxidative stability and nutrition are constantly sought after. Industrial uses of soybean oil which is subjected to further processing include ingredients for paints, plastics, fibers, detergents, cosmetics, and lubricants. Soybean oil may be split, inter-esterified, sulfurized, epoxidized, polymerized, ethoxylated, or cleaved. Designing and producing soybean oil derivatives with improved functionality, oliochemistry, is a rapidly growing field. The typical mixture of triglycerides is usually split and separated into pure fatty acids, which are then combined with petroleum-derived alcohols or acids, nitrogen, sulfonates, chlorine, or with fatty alcohols derived from fats and oils.

Soybean is also used as a food source for both animals and humans. Soybean is widely used as a source of protein for animal feeds for poultry, swine and cattle. During processing of whole soybeans, the fibrous hull is removed and the oil is extracted. The remaining soybean meal is a combination of carbohydrates and approximately 50% protein.

For human consumption soybean meal is made into soybean flour which is processed to protein concentrates used for meat extenders or specialty pet foods. Production of edible protein ingredients from soybean offers a healthy, less expensive replacement for animal protein in meats as well as dairy-type products.

Genetic Marker Profile Through SSR

The present invention also comprises a soybean plant which may be characterized by molecular and physiological data obtained from the representative sample of said variety deposited with the ATCC. Further provided by the invention is a soybean plant formed by the combination of the disclosed soybean plant or plant cell with another soybean plant or cell and characterized by being heterozygous for the molecular data of the variety.

In addition to phenotypic observations, a plant can also be identified by its genotype. The genotype of a plant can be characterized through a genetic marker profile which can identify plants of the same variety or a related variety or be used to determine or validate a pedigree. Genetic marker profiles can be obtained by techniques such as Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphisms (RFLPs), Randomly Amplified Polymorphic DNAs (RAPDs), Arbitrarily Primed Polymerase Chain Reaction (AP-PCR), DNA Amplification Fingerprinting (DAF), Sequence Characterized Amplified Regions (SCARs), Amplified Fragment Length Polymorphisms (AFLPs), Simple Sequence Repeats (SSRs) which are also referred to as Microsatellites, and Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms (SNPs). For example, see Cregan, supra, which is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.

Particular markers used for these purposes are not limited to any particular set of markers, but are envisioned to include any type of marker and marker profile which provides a means of distinguishing varieties. One method of comparison is where only the loci for which 91B42 is homozygous are used. For example, one set of publically available markers which could be used to screen and identify variety 91B42 is disclosed in table A.

Soybean SSR Fingerprints with molecular size range alleles Allele Size Marker 91B42 Satt572 172.2-174.2 Satt165 210.0-212.0 Satt042 163.1-165.1 Satt300 253.7-255.7 Satt050 224.2-226.2 Satt385 149.0-152.0 Satt545 290.3-292.3 Satt225 108.6-110.6 Satt133 163.3-165.3 Satt233 103.5-105.5 Satt327 253.7-255.7 Satt421 144.6-148.6 Satt470 266.2-268.2 Satt455 275.5-277.5 Satt409 186.7-188.7 Satt228 328.9-330.9 Satt426 204.9-206.9 Satt509 192.0-194.0 Satt251 215.5-217.5 Satt197 192.6-194.6 Satt577 312.0-314.0 Satt467 294.4-296.4 Sct034 130.1-132.1 Satt304 162.2-164.2 Satt601 344.2-346.2 Satt556 148.1-150.1 Satt122 234.0-236.0 Satt534 189.5-191.5 Satt565 302.6-304.6 Sct186 116.6-118.6 Satt227 326.6-328.6 Satt432 257.7-259.7 Satt457 370.5-372.5 Satt557 219.8-221.8 Sct028 235.8-237.8 Satt357 171.3-173.3 Satt532 172.6-174.6 Satt221 233.5-235.5 Satt383 350.7-352.7 Satt295 222.8-224.8 Satt507 232.9-234.9 Satt147 193.2-195.2 Satt266 330.4-332.4 Satt412 260.3-262.3 Satt546 356.9-358.9 Satt172 167.0-169.0 Sctt008 158.7-160.7 Satt328 250.6-252.6 Satt372 339.3-341.3 Satt582 335.8-337.8 Satt389 172.9-174.9 Satt543 198.0-200.0 Satt186 366.9-368.9 Sct137 272.8-274.8 Satt213 325.6-327.6 Satt384 153.1-155.1 Satt411 100.6-102.6 Satt598 162.8-164.8 Satt204 234.4-236.4 Satt602 342.1-344.1 Satt452 259.1-261.1 Satt193 174.1-176.1 Satt348 332.1-334.1 Satt188 251.7-253.7 Satt144 210.6-212.6 Sat090 349.5-351.5 Satt594 147.0-149.0 Satt303 143.5-145.5 Satt517 161.9-163.9 Sat117 209.8-211.8 Sct187 314.9-317.9 Satt353 159.0-161.0 Satt568 350.1-352.1 Satt279 198.3-200.3 Satt142 143.8-145.8 Satt451 355.7-357.7 Satt367 220.0-224.0 Satt127 244.0-246.0 Sctt012 351.5-353.5 Satt270 143.8-145.8 Sat104 265.9-267.9 Satt440 306.9-308.9 Satt249 250.6-252.6 Satt596 272.4-274.4 Satt380 150.7-152.7 Satt183 121.6-123.6 Satt431 347.6-349.6 Satt102 159.6-161.6 Satt555 270.9-272.9 Satt441 176.1-178.1 Satt475 149.9-151.9 Satt196 241.3-243.3 Satt523 170.8-172.8 Satt284 123.9-125.9 Satt513 141.7-143.7 Satt590 338.1-340.1 Satt567 114.8-116.8 Satt540 180.7-182.7 Satt175 168.8-170.8 Satt551 242.5-244.5 Satt250 188.5-190.5 Satt336 181.7-183.7 Satt255 245.4-247.4 Satt234 177.9-179.9 Satt257 254.9-256.9 Satt358 206.4-208.4 Satt259 207.9-209.9 Satt420 260.2-262.2 Satt262 246.7-248.7 Satt478 253.8-255.8 Satt592 254.2-256.2 Satt153 197.8-199.8 Satt243 333.7-335.7

Primers and PCR protocols for assaying these markers are disclosed on the internet on 129.186.26.94/SSR.html. In addition to being used for identification of Soybean variety, a soybean plant produced through the use of 91B42, and the identification or verification of pedigree for progeny plants produced through the use of 91B42, the genetic marker profile is also useful in breeding and developing single gene conversions.

Means of performing genetic marker profiles using SSR polymorphisms are well known in the art. SSRs are genetic markers based on polymorphisms in repeated nucleotide sequences, such as microsatellites. A marker system based on SSRs can be highly informative in linkage analysis relative to other marker systems in that multiple alleles may be present. Another advantage of this type of marker is that, through use of flanking primers, detection of SSRs can be achieved, for example, by the polymerase chain reaction (PCR), thereby eliminating the need for labor-intensive Southern hybridization. The PCR™ detection is done by use of two oligonucleotide primers flanking the polymorphic segment of repetitive DNA. Repeated cycles of heat denaturation of the DNA followed by annealing of the primers to their complementary sequences at low temperatures, and extension of the annealed primers with DNA polymerase, comprise the major part of the methodology.

Following amplification, markers can be scored by gel electrophoresis of the amplification products. Scoring of marker genotype is based on the size of the amplified fragment as measured by molecular weight (MW) rounded to the nearest integer. While variation in the primer used or in laboratory procedures can affect the reported molecular weight, relative values should remain constant regardless of the specific primer or laboratory used. When comparing varieties it is preferable if all SSR profiles are performed in the same lab.

Primers used are publicly available and may be found in the Soybase supra. or Cregan supra. See also, PCT Publication No. WO 99/31964 Nucleotide Polymorphisms in Soybean, U.S. Pat. No. 6,162,967 Positional Cloning of Soybean Cyst Nematode Resistance Genes, and US 2002/0129402A1 Soybean Sudden Death Syndrome Resistant Soybeans and Methods of Breeding and Identifying Resistant Plants, the disclosure of which are incorporated herein by reference.

The SSR profile of soybean plant 91B42 can be used to identify plants comprising 91B42 as a parent, since such plants will comprise the same alleles as 91B42. Because the soybean plant is essentially homozygous at all relevant loci, an inbred should, in almost all cases, have only one allele at each locus. In contrast, a genetic marker profile of an F1 progeny should be the sum of those parents, e.g., if one inbred parent had the allele 168 (base pairs) at a particular locus, and the other inbred parent had 172 the hybrid is 168.172 (heterozygous) by inference. Subsequent generations of progeny produced by selection and breeding are expected to be of genotype 168 (homozygous), 172 (homozygous), or 168.172 for that locus position. When the F1 plant is used to produce an inbred, the locus should be either 168 or 172 for that position.

In addition, plants and plant parts substantially benefiting from the use of 91B42 in their development such as 91B42 comprising a single gene conversion, transgene, or genetic sterility factor, may be identified by having a molecular marker profile with a high percent identity to 91B42. Such a percent identity might be 98%, 99%, 99.5% or 99.9% identical to 91B42.

The SSR profile of 91B42 also can be used to identify essentially derived varieties and other progeny varieties developed from the use of 91B42, as well as cells and other plant parts thereof. Progeny plants and plant parts produced using 91B42 may be identified by having a molecular marker profile of at least 25%, 30%, 35%, 40%, 45%, 50%, 55%, 60%, 65%, 70%, 75%, 79%, 80%, 81%, 82%, 83%, 84%, 85%, 86%, 87%, 88%, 89%, 90%, 91%, 92%, 93%, 94%, 95%, 96%, 97%, 98%, 99% or 99.5% genetic contribution from soybean variety. Such plants may be developed using the markers identified in WO 00/31964, U.S. Pat. No. 6,162,967 and US2002/0129402A1.

Unique SSR Profiles

While determining the SSR genetic marker profile of the plants described supra, several unique SSR profiles may be identified which did not appear in either parent of such plant.

Such unique SSR profiles may arise during the breeding process from recombination or mutation. A combination of several unique alleles provides a means of uniquely identifying a plant variety, a hybrid produced from such variety, and progeny produced from such variety and comprising such unique SSR profile, regardless of the number of generations or breeding cycles removed. Such progeny may be further characterized as being within a pedigree distance of 91B42, such as within 1,2,3, 4 or 5 or less cross-pollinations to a soybean plant other than 91B42 or a plant that has 91B42 as a progenitor. Unique molecular profiles may be identified with other molecular tools such as SNPs and RFLPs.

Unique Marker Profile Analysis

Table B gives Unique Marker Profile data for soybean variety 91B42.

TABLE B TRAIT LINKAGE GROUP plasmid 91B42 SCN Lg G p10355B-1 R SCN Lg B1 p12198A-1 R SCN Lg G p7659A-2 R SCN Lg B1 p8584A-1 R RPS6 Lg G p10792A-1 RPS6 R = Resistant marker S = Susceptible marker SCN resistance based upon information disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,162,967 A Phytophthora resistance based upon information in public sector for linkage groups N, F, and G SCN resistance, based upon information in U.S. Pat. No. 6,271,437 B1 Protocals used in determining resistance follow: Phytophthora Root Rot Growth Chamber Screening

Phytophthora root rot (PMG) screens are conducted in growth room (GR). The plants are inoculated when the unifoliate leaves are present, but not yet expanded. Four days after inoculation, the plants are removed from the chamber for evaluation and scoring. A 9-point scoring system of evaluating the number of live plants over total inoculated is used. For example: a score of “9” indicates that 9 out of 9 plants are alive and growing; a score of “5” indicates that 5 of the nine plants survived inoculation; a score of “1” would imply that none of the plants lived.

The differentials used, and the genes that it corresponds with are as follows:

Gene (Rps) Differential 1a L75-6141 1b L77-1863 1c L75-3735 1d PI103091 1k WM82 3a L83-570 3b L91-8347 3c 31937N172 4 L85-2352 5 L85-3059 6 62XX 7 L93-3458 susc. Sloan

Soybean Cyst Nematode Scoring

The traditional method for classifying SCN resistance in soybean varieties has been the Index of Parasitism (IP). The amount of SCN reproduction on a variety is compared to that of a susceptible benchmark, usually Lee or Lee74, to determine the IP for that variety. This procedure assigns SCN resistance into four discrete classes: ≦10% IP are considered resistant (R); 11-30% IP are considered moderately resistant (MR); 31-60% IP are considered moderately susceptible (MS); and >61% IP are considered susceptible (S). This standard has been used almost universally by both public and private soybean breeders for the past 30 years.

Variety Index of Score Parasitism 9  0-7% IP 8  8-15% 7 16-23% 6 24-32% 5 33-40% 4 41-50% 3 51-60% 2 61-70% 1 >71%

Iron deficiency chlorosis screening nurseries are planted in May on soils (in the field) known to induce yellowing symptoms in soybean. The varieties are usually scored in early July, the exact date is dependent upon the progression of the symptoms. The rating scale below is used.

Iron Chlorosis Scores Score Symptoms 9 All plants are normal green color. 8 A few plants are showing very fight chlorosis on 1 or 2 leaves. 7 Less than half of the plants showing moderate chlorosis (light green leaves). 6 More than half the plants showing moderate chlorosis, but no necrosis seen on leaves. 5 Most plants are light green to yellow, no necrosis seen on leaves. Most plants are stunted (50-75% of normal height). 4 Most plants are yellow, necrosis seen on edges of less than half the leaves. Most plants are app. 50% of normal height. 3 Most plants are yellow, necrosis seen on most leaves. Most plants are app. 20-40% of normal height. 2 Most leaves are almost dead, most stems are still green. Plants are severely stunted (10-20% of normal height). 1 Most plants are completely dead. The plants that are still alive are app. 10% of normal height, and have very little living tissue.

The foregoing were used to determine resistance as reported herein.

Performance Examples of 91B42

In the examples that follow in Table 2, the traits and characteristics of soybean variety 91B42 are given in paired comparisons with the five Pioneer varieties 9132, 91B53, 9163, 9172, and 91B92. These results show 91B42 and the comparison variety grown in the same replication(s), with each replication being conducted in the same growing conditions and the same year. Table 2 shows mean values for the stated number of replications of 91B42 and the paired comparison variety. The data collected on each soybean variety is presented for key characteristics and traits, with one characteristic or trait shown per Table 2 section. For example, with respect to yield bu/a shown in the first section of Table 2, there were 42 replications comparing the yield of 91B42 to the yield of 9132. 91B42 had a mean value of 48.0 bushels per acre for these 42 replications. Thus, 91B42 yielded 2.2 bu/a more than 9132, which is statistically significant (P=0.01). In addition to a significantly higher yield when compared to 9132, 91B42 showed significantly better scores for tolerance to iron-deficiency chlorosis. In the comparison of 91B42 to 91B53, 91B42 had significantly earlier maturity. The data comparing 91B42 to 9163 showed that 91B42 had significantly higher yield, significantly fewer lodged plants, and significantly greater scores for tolerance to iron-deficiency chlorosis. When 91B42 was compared to 9172, 91B42 had significantly greater scores for tolerance to iron-deficiency chlorosis. In the comparison of soybean variety 91B42 to 91B92, 91B42 demonstrated significantly better seedling vigor scores and significantly greater scores for tolerance to iron-deficiency chlorosis.

TABLE 2 1476 VARIETY COMPARISON DATA FOR 91B42 Mean2 # Reps Diff 91B42 Mean2 Prob YIELD bu/a 9132 42 2.2 48.0 45.8 0.01 91B53 37 −2.4 47.4 49.8 0.01 9163 42 2.4 48.0 45.6 0.00 9172 29 −0.1 49.8 49.8 0.95 91B92 12 −2.3 44.0 46.3 0.20 MAT ABS 9132 25 3.2 127.1 124.0 0.00 91B53 23 −2.6 126.9 129.5 0.00 9163 25 −1.4 127.1 128.5 0.00 9172 19 −2.1 127.8 129.9 0.00 91B92  6 −4.5 124.8 129.3 0.01 HGT 9132 12 0.6 34.3 34.9 0.28 91B53 11 0.0 34.2 34.2 1.00 9163 12 4.3 34.3 38.7 0.00 9172  8 0.4 37.6 38.0 0.58 91B92  4 1.0 27.8 28.8 0.42 LDGSEV 9132  7 0.4 6.1 5.7 0.59 91B53  5 −1.0 6.4 7.4 0.14 9163  7 1.7 6.1 4.4 0.04 9172  7 −0.1 6.1 6.3 0.85 91B92 . . . . EMGSC 9132 17 −0.7 5.1 5.8 0.39 91B53 17 −0.4 5.1 5.5 0.62 9163 17 −2.2 5.1 7.4 0.00 9172 11 −2.3 4.8 7.1 0.04 91B92  6 −1.5 5.7 7.2 0.19 SDVIG 9132 16 0.6 7.1 6.4 0.26 91B53 16 0.7 7.1 6.4 0.28 9163 16 −0.7 7.1 7.8 0.16 9172 10 −1.4 6.6 8.0 0.04 91B92  6 0.8 7.8 7.0 0.04 HYPL 9132  9 −1.4 6.6 8.0 0.14 91B53  9 3.4 6.6 3.2 0.10 9163  9 −2.4 6.6 8.9 0.04 9172  6 −0.9 8.1 9.0 0.08 91B92  3 0.3 3.5 3.1 0.19 FEC 9132 25 1.8 6.3 4.6 0.00 91B53 22 0.5 6.3 5.8 0.20 9163 25 0.7 6.3 5.6 0.02 9172 19 1.6 6.8 4.3 0.00 91B92  6 2.8 7.8 5.0 0.01

DEPOSITS

Applicants have made a deposit of at least 2500 seeds of Soybean Variety 91B42 with the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC), Manassas, Va. 20110-2209 USA, ATCC Deposit No. PTA-4649. The seeds deposited with the ATCC on Sep. 6, 2002 were taken from the deposit maintained by Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc., 800 Capital Square, 400 Locust Street, Des Moines, Iowa 50309-2340 since prior to the filing date of this application. Access to this deposit will be available during the pendency of the application to the Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks and persons determined by the Commissioner to be entitled thereto upon request. Upon allowance of any claims in the application, the Applicant(s) will make available to the public, pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 1.808, sample(s) of the deposit of at least 2500 seeds of variety 91B42 with the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC), 10801 University Boulevard, Manassas, Va. 20110-2209. This deposit of the Soybean Variety 91B42 will be maintained in the ATCC depository, which is a public depository, for a period of 30 years, or 5 years after the most recent request, or for the enforceable life of the patent, whichever is longer, and will be replaced if it becomes nonviable during that period. Additionally, Applicants have satisfied all the requirements of 37 C.F.R §§1.801-1.809, including providing an indication of the viability of the sample upon deposit. Applicants have no authority to waive any restrictions imposed by law on the transfer of biological material or its transportation in commerce. Applicants do not waive any infringement of their rights granted under this patent or under the Plant Variety Protection Act (7 USC 2321 et seq.). U.S. Plant Variety Protection of Soybean Variety 91B42 has been applied for under Application No. 200200079.

All publications, patents and patent applications mentioned in the specification are indicative of the level of those skilled in the art to which this invention pertains. All such publications, patents and patent applications are incorporated by reference herein to the same extent as if each was specifically and individually indicated to be incorporated by reference herein.

The foregoing invention has been described in detail by way of illustration and example for purposes of clarity and understanding. However, it will be obvious that certain changes and modifications such as single gene modifications and mutations, somoclonal variants, variant individuals selected from large populations of the plants of the instant variety and the like may be practiced within the scope of the invention, as limited only by the scope of the appended claims. 

1. Seed of soybean variety 91B42, representative seed of said soybean variety 91B42 having been deposited under ATCC Accession No. PTA-4649.
 2. A soybean plant, or a part thereof, produced by growing the seed of claim
 1. 3. The soybean plant part of claim 2 wherein said part is pollen.
 4. The soybean plant part of claim 2 wherein said part an ovule.
 5. A tissue culture of protoplasts or regenerable cells from the plant of claim
 2. 6. A tissue culture according to claim 5, the cells or protoplasts of the tissue culture are obtained from plant tissues selected from the group consisting of: leaf, pollen, cotyledon, hypocotyl, embryos, root, pod, flower, shoot and stem.
 7. A soybean plant regenerated from the tissue culture of claim 5, having all the morphological and physiological characteristics of soybean variety 91B42, representative seed of said soybean variety 91B42 having been deposited under ATCC Accession No. PTA-4649.
 8. A method for producing a progeny soybean plant comprising: crossing the soybean plant of claim 2 with a second soybean plant; harvesting resultant soybean seed; and growing a soybean plant. 